“Morality is doing what is right regardless of what you are told. Obedience is doing what is told regardless of what is right.” (H.L. Mencken)
I believe
it’s a good thing my cancer retired me from actively being employed at a job in
the working world. Blind obedience (which is a behavior where people do as
they’re told without thinking for themselves about whether what they heard was
true, or whether they should obey orders) has never been an easy concept for me
to grasp at any phase in my life in regards to obeying any kind of authority
(sometimes including God).
In my past when
I didn’t agree with authority, I ignored their directive, which never goes well
in a work, personal, or church environment.
I believe people who have the ability to think through a situation can
struggle with blind obedience if their opinions differ from an authority figure
in charge. There is nothing worse than obeying an authority figure, and having
that decision backfire on you so that you are the one left in trouble because
you did as you were told.
Obedience is a form of social influence where an individual
acts in response to a direct order from another individual, who is usually an
authority figure. Obedience occurs when
you are told to do something (authority), whereas conformity happens through social pressure (the norms of the
majority). The Bible often
communicates to us what you would prefer not to hear. What does it say in
regards to submitting to authority?
Romans 13:2
(TPT) says: So to resist authority is to resist the divine
order of God, which results in severe consequences. I
don’t see any exceptions to that rule in scripture. This leads me to believe that all those times
I have fought against authority in my life that I’ve been fighting against God’s
will, which is a dangerous and unintelligent thing to do. I despise admitting
this, but in this case I was wrong. That was unpleasant (and kind of painful) to
admit that. Maybe I should do it more often so I get more used to doing that.
If you happen to be in a place of leadership where work, and are dealing with an employee that challenges and undermines your authority. Below are four general guidelines you can follow in dealing with this challenging employee:
Listen: When an employee is being difficult, the first
reaction that some leaders have is to simply form an opinion of the employee
and stop paying attention to what’s going on. You feel irritated, and the
situation seems hopeless. Great leaders know that the best way to deal with
this situation is to become extra attentive. They make an effort to develop the
clearest possible understanding of the situation – this includes understanding
the point of view of the difficult employee.
This is typically the first step towards improving
the situation. In fact, you can resolve the problem in itself simply by
listening and paying attention. It’s possible that the employee in question is
facing legitimate problems that you can address. You may find out about a real
workplace issue that’s not the employee’s fault which needs to be resolved. The
difficult employee may even start behaving differently once they feel heard and
acknowledged.
Feedback: When an employee undermines your
authority, you often end up thinking about the employee’s negative behavior and
complaining about it to others. Some authority figures spend months griping
about difficult employees without ever giving them actual behavioral feedback
in a straightforward manner. Giving hard-hitting and sensible feedback is one
of the most uncomfortable things that you will have to do as a leader.
It is one of the most critical skills that you must
develop as a leader. Great leaders learn to do it well, and they are ready to
do it if and when a situation calls for it. It’s worth becoming comfortable and
proficient at giving corrective feedback to your employees. The best approach
to giving this type of behavioral feedback is to lower the other person’s
defensiveness, and provide them with the specific information they need for
improvement and success in their job.
If the employee acknowledges their negative behavior
and begins to apply the corrective feedback, then consider the problem resolved
once you’ve taken these two steps. If the situation does not improve, you’ll
need to consider the following further steps.
Document: It’s at this stage that the employee is being difficult
despite your efforts to reach out, listen, and share corrective feedback. Now
that you are having significant problems with this employee, don’t forget to write down the
key points. This can’t be stressed enough. Many authority
figures do not document incidences of misconduct in the hopes that this will be
an isolated incidence.
Great leaders understand that it’s practical to
create a record of this sort of behavior. Even if you are able to resolve the
issue before it comes to suspension or termination, you can simply put the
documentation back in the drawer. But, if it doesn’t exist in the first place,
you will have no grounds to base your next actions on.
Consequences: If you have been noting a pattern
of negative behavior and insubordination for an extended period of time,
despite having shared clear feedback, it’s time to get specific. If you have
identified an individual on your team who is not meeting standards, give them
eight weeks to change (in some way). From weeks one through eight, make sure
that the employee has your full support and attention. Feel comfortable sharing
corrective feedback during this time when it is needed.
Hopefully, before the end of week eight the employee
will proactively acknowledge their incorrect job performance, and correct it. If
by the end of week eight you are still noting unsatisfactory behavior to you or
unacceptable work performance, either relocate them. This doesn’t necessarily
mean job termination. If possible, you can also consider switching them to
another team in the organization. Look for creative ways to ensure the employee
can’t affect you or the team. If things are going down a road where termination
is inevitable, in the weeks following up to it, let the employee know that
their insubordination may have a real negative impact on their position in the
company.
Laying someone off is one of the most difficult
tasks for every leader. If it does get to this point, do it right, without
making excuses, or putting it off, or making someone else do it. If things do
turn around, then be courageous enough to accept that someone you thought
wasn’t salvageable is now working hard to prove you wrong.
“There is a
difference between being a leader and being a boss. Both are based on
authority. A boss demands blind obedience. A leader earns his authority through
understanding and trust.” (Klaus Balkenhol)[i]
[i] Adapted from:
·
“How to Manage Employees Who
Undermine Your Authority” by Paul Keijzer
·
“Is There a Mystery to ‘Blind
Obedience’?” by Nasreen Pejvack

No comments:
Post a Comment